A comparison of power orientation and power motivation of female nurse managers and other female managers in Jordan
Author: Daghestani AMJ
Source:
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO, HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER 1991 PH.D. (224 p)
The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in the power construct between nursing managers and other female managers in Jordan and between top management and middle management levels, in order to better understand the power phenomenThree goals were examined in this study: (1) To describe and compare the social power motive of nurse managers and other managers by management level. (2) To compare power orientations of nurse managers and other managers by their management level. (3) To identify and describe power related characteristics as perceived by the managers in order to provide a profile of powerful females in Jordan. Four data collection instruments were used: a demographic questionnaire, Social Orientation Inventory, Power Orientation Scale, and a power perception questionnaire. A total of 127 subjects were studied, 76 of them were nurse managers and 51 were female managers from fields other than nursing, mainly education. Results indicated significant differences between top and middle management levels in social power motive, the two power orientations of power as resource dependency and of power as control and autonomy, where top management levels scored significantly higher than the middle management level in both groups. The results also revealed significant differences between the nursing and non nursing groups in relation to power as control and autonomy, with the nursing group scoring significantly higher than the non nursing group in this factor. Several recommendations related to education, training, practice, and future research were made as a result of this study.