Oral fluphenazine versus placebo for schizophrenia.
Author: Matar HE, Almerie MQ.
Source:
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, (1), CD006352-CD006352.
BACKGROUND: Fluphenazine is one of the first drugs to be classed as an
'antipsychotic' and has been widely available for five decades. OBJECTIVES: To
evaluate the effects of oral fluphenazine for schizophrenia in comparison with
placebo. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's trials
register (September 2006) which includes relevant randomised controlled trials
from the bibliographic databases Biological Abstracts, CINAHL, The Cochrane
Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycLIT, LILACS, PSYNDEX, Sociological Abstracts and
Sociofile. References of all identified studies were searched for further trial
citations. SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought all randomised controlled trials
comparing oral fluphenazine with placebo relevant to people with schizophrenia.
Primary outcomes of interest were global state and adverse effects. DATA
COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We inspected citations and abstracts independently,
ordered papers and re-inspected and quality assessed trials. We extracted data
independently. Dichotomous data were analysed using fixed effects relative risk
(RR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous data were excluded if more
than 50% of people were lost to follow up, but, where possible, weighted mean
differences (WMD) were calculated. MAIN RESULTS: We found over 1200 electronic
records for 415 studies, 47 of which were relevant but only seven could be
included. Compared with placebo, in the short-term, global state outcomes for
'not improved' were not significantly different (n=75, 2 RCTs, RR 0.71 CI 0.5 to
1.1). There is evidence that oral fluphenazine, in the short term, increases a
person's chances of experiencing extrapyramidal effects such as akathisia (n=227,
2 RCTs, RR 3.43 CI 1.2 to 9.6, NNH 13 CI 4 to 128) and rigidity (n=227, 2 RCTs,
RR 3.54 CI 1.8 to 7.1, NNH 6 CI 3 to 17). We found study attrition to be lower in
the oral fluphenazine group, but data were not statistically significant (n=227,
2 RCTs, RR 0.70 CI 0.4 to 1.1). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this review
confirm much that clinicians and recipients of care already know, but they
provide quantification to support clinical impression. Fluphenazine's global
position as an effective treatment for psychoses is not threatened by the outcome
of this review. However, fluphenazine is an imperfect treatment and If
accessible, other inexpensive drugs less associated with adverse effects may be
an equally effective choice for people with schizophrenia.