Initial linguistic and psychometric validation of the Arabic version of Nepean Dyspepsia Index
Author: Khalil MS, Wahass SH, Al Qourain AA, Yassawy MI
Source:
Saudi medical journal, 27(10), 1554.
OBJECTIVE: To report the initial evaluation of the linguistic and psychometric
validation of the Nepean Dyspepsia Index (NDI), as part of the ongoing research
of quality of life among dyspeptic patients. METHODS: The Arabic version of the
NDI was administered to 158 subjects (54 with non-ulcer dyspeptic [NUD]), 50 with
gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and 54 with no history of gastroenteritis
disease), with a mean age of 46.6 and SD 10.7. All subjects answered the Arabic
versions of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), the Self-Report Questionnaire
(SRQ), and the Short Form-12 Quality of Life (QOL) scale. We administered the
final translation of the NDI by consensus. The study was conducted in King Fahad
Hospital of the University, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia, between December 2002 and
January 2004. RESULTS: The NDI has shown adequate internal consistency. Cronbach
Alpha coefficient ranged between 0.88 to 0.93, and Split-half correlation
reliability ranged between 0.82 and 0.94. Correlations between NDI subscales and
total scores were high and significant. Adequate Face and content validity was
demonstrated by consultation with gastroenterologists and clinical psychologists.
Convergent validity was shown in the moderate and significant correlation of the
NDI subscales and global index with the indices of the SF-12. Divergent validity
was shown in that subscales of the NDI revealed low correlation with scales which
measure other dimensions; thus, both QOL subscales and symptom checklist have
discriminated patients from non-patients groups (p > 0.01). The factorial
structure of the NDI was also examined, and it revealed 4 factors, which is
similarly the same with other studies. CONCLUSION: The initial validation of the
Arabic version of the NDI has shown that this scale has adequate psychometric and
linguistic property and can represent a good addition to health outcome measures
in dyspepsia research. Further validation studies are recommended.