A community study on emotional distress among Arab and Jewish Israelis over the age of 60.
Author: Shemesh AA, Kohn R, Blumstein T, Geraisy N, Novikov I, Levav I.
Source:
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: A journal of the psychiatry of late life and allied sciences, 21(1), 64-76.
BACKGROUND: The elderly constitute a vulnerable group for psychopathology, yet
research on their mental health among both Arab and Jews in Israel remains
limited. The same is the case in Arab countries. This paper reports on the
contrasting distribution of the mean emotional distress (ED) scores and rates of
suspected clinical cases, and their related risk factors, among community
residents over the age of 60. METHODS: Several national agencies conducted a
survey on 5,055 elderly individuals to investigate their health status, including
ED. The interview included socio-demographic and behavioral health items, as well
as a modified 12 item-GHQ as a measure of ED. Total ED scores and prevalence
rates for suspected psychopathology were calculated. Their respective risk
factors were examined using univariate and multivariate methods. RESULTS: The ED
scores were highest among Muslim Arabs (4.9), followed by Christian Arabs (4.2),
Jews (3.1) and Druzes (2.8). Their estimated prevalence rates were 43.4%, 37.0%,
21.4%, and 17.0%, respectively. The gradient of these results remained unchanged
in the multivariate analysis for ED scores adjusting for confounding variables.
In contrast, logistic regression analysis controlling for confounding variables
did not find a differential risk for suspected psychopathology between Arabs and
Jews. CONCLUSION: Conceivably, the higher demoralization scores among elderly
Arabs are associated with their minority status affiliation, as well as with the
rapid social changes that have taken place in their midst. A cultural response
style may be entertained as a possible explanation. However, these factors do not
impact the risk for suspected psychopathology where no differential risk was
noted after adjustments for confounders. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Publication Types:
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't