Subjective quality of life of community living Sudanese psychiatric patients: comparison with family caregivers' impressions and control group.
Author: Awadalla AW, Ohaeri JU, Salih AA, Tawfiq AM.
Source:
Quality of Life Research, 14(8), 1855-1867.
BACKGROUND: Researchers have paid scant attention to comparative studies of
quality of life (QOL) issues among psychiatric diagnostic groups; the studies of
patient-caregiver concordance ratings had small sample sizes; and the reports are
rare from the African and Arab worlds. OBJECTIVES: to assess the subjective QOL
of stable Sudanese outpatients, using the WHOQOL-Bref, compared with a general
population sample; examine the caregiver-patient concordance; and assess the
variables that impact on domains of QOL. METHOD: The responses of outpatients
with schizophrenia (99), major affective disorders (120) and neuroses (81) (mean
age 33.8) were compared with 211 controls and the impression of their family
caregivers. RESULTS: Patients were dissatisfied with life circumstances; the
schizophrenia group and those with co-morbidity had significantly lower QOL
scores; while the control group had higher QOL scores. There was no significant
impact on QOL domains, of socio-demographic factors, duration of illness and
treatment side effects. The schizophrenia group had least concordance with
caregivers, but eight items were judged to be satisfactorily concordant for all
groups. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric patients in stable condition can make reliable
judgments of QOL, with relatives providing additional information. Differences in
QOL and concordance of ratings reflect disease severity.